Legal Opinion
LNV Corp. v. Fauley
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 18, 2016No. 3:15-cv-01422-HZPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ, United States District Judge
Plaintiff LNV Corporation seeks judicial foreclosure against Defendant Robynne Fauley. Currently before the Court is LNV’s motion for summary judgment. There is no dispute that LNV is the holder of the note and that Ms. Fauley has defaulted. Therefore, LNV’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are undisputed except where noted otherwise. In June of 2012, Fauley received a loan from Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu”) for $330,000. Hamilton Decl. ¶¶ 6-7, Ex. 1 at 1, ECF Nos. 24, 24-1. The loan is evidence by a Promissory…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bias v. MoynihanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Federal Trade Commission v. StefanchikCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Earl v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Suever v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ruffner v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of WashingtonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020