Legal Opinion
Suever v. Connell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 26, 2009No. 08-15884, 08-16161PublishedCited by 160 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, an uncertified class of individuals whose financial assets escheated to the Controller’s Office pursuant to California’s unclaimed property law (UPL), Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §§ 1300, et seq., sued alleging insufficient notice and mishandling of their property. Defendants are Kathleen Connell, Richard Chivaro, Steve Westly, and George DeLeon (collectively, the Controller). 1 For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the district court’s (1) denial without prejudice of Plaintiffs’ motion for a permanent injunction requiring the State to pay interest…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- Osu Student Alliance v. Ed RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Chris Taylor v. John ChiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Global Executive Management Solutions, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Copeland-Turner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Oregon · 2011
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.