Legal Opinion

In Re Ewer

California Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1918No. S. F. No. 8557PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The decree of final distribution of the estate of Warren B. Ewer, deceased, recited “that in accordance with the provisions of the last will and testament of said deceased the said residue now remaining in the hands of said executor should be distributed as follows: To Ora S. Ewer, widow, $5,000.00. To Eliza B. Ewer, surviving daughter, $500.00 ... To Chas. E. Naylor, as trustee for Eliza B. Ewer, $25,000.00.” The decree then provided “that the residue of said estate hereinabove particularly described and mentioned be, and the same is hereby distributed as follows: To Ora S. Ewer, widow,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Horton v. WinbiglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. McCloud v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Callnon v. WinrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Estate of LockhartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. State v. UnderwoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Fraser v. Carman-RylesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API