McCloud v. Hewlett
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. Louttit & Middlecoff, T. J. Elliott, J. B. Webster, and A. C. White, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action against defendant Samuel Hewlett, as executor of the last will of Alonzo McCloud, deceased, and certain other defendants on the official bond of said executor.
It appears from the findings that said Alonzo died in 1893, and in his last will named defendant Samuel Hewlett and one R. D. Baldwin as executors, who were duly appointed and qualified as such executors August 5, 1893; executor Baldwin died October 7, 1897; upon qualifying as executor, said Hewlett executed the bond on which the suit is brought. Notice to creditors was duly given, and in due time decree of publication…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Goldtree v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- United States v. CrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by17 opinions
- Luscomb v. FintzelbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Horton v. WinbiglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Callnon v. WinrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Estate of LockhartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- In Re Thomas' EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.