Legal Opinion

Samson Resources Co. v. Amerada Hess Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 6, 2001No. 96,762PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CAROL M. HANSEN, Chief Judge:

11 Defendant/Appellants, Amerada Hess Corporation (Amerada) and Chesapeake Exploration Limited Partnership (Chesapeake), successor by merger to DLB Oil & Gas, Inc. (DLB), seek review of the trial court's final order granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff/Appellee, Samson - Resources Company (Samson) on Samson's claim for specific performance under the preferential right to purchase clauses of three oil and gas joint operating agreements (JOAs). We hold Amerada was required by the maintenance of unit ownership clause of each JOA to offer its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Ollie v. RainboltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Anco Mfg. & Supply Company, Inc. v. SwankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Travelers Property Casualty Corp. v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Navasota Resources, L.P. v. First Source Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  2. Navasota Resources, L.P. v. First Source Texas, Inc., First Source Gas, LP, Gastar Exploration Texas, LLC F/K/A Bossier Basin, LLC, First Texas Gas, LP, First Source Bossier LLC, Gastar Exploration, LTD., Chesapeake Energy Corp., Chesapeake Exploration LP & Chesapeake Operating. Inc, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API