Legal Opinion
State v. Guy
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1989No. 15530PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOGAN, Judge.
A jury has found Horace Dean Guy guilty of selling marihuana in violation of § 195.020, RSMo 1986. His punishment has been assessed at imprisonment for a term of ten (10) years. The defendant appeals. We affirm.
Inasmuch as this is the defendant’s appeal of constitutional right, Ross v. Moffitt, 417 U.S. 600, 94 S.Ct. 2437, 41 L.Ed.2d 341 (1974), we consider the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict sua sponte. In assessing the sufficiency of the evidence, this court must accept as true all evidence and inferences therefrom which tend to support the verdict and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State v. OlinghouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. NewsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. ManesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. StatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991