Legal Opinion

Osage Tribe of Indians v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 31, 2008No. 99-550 LPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

EMILY C. HEWITT, Judge.

On October 15, 2007, eight individuals who identify themselves as “personal owners of allotted shares or ‘headrights’ of the Osage Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma” (proposed in-tervenors) filed their Motion to Intervene and Amend Complaint and Brief in Support (Mot. Int. or motion to intervene) 1. Plaintiff responded to the motion to intervene by filing Plaintiff Osage Nation’s1 Motion to Disqualify Bradley D. Brickell as Counsel for the Proposed Intervenors (Pl.’s Mot. or plaintiffs motion to disqualify) on November 16, 2007. The proposed intervenors…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Osage Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Fletcher v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2015
  3. Fletcher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API