Hargrove v. Plumbing & Heating Service of Greensboro, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Both defendants assign error to the denial of their motions for directed verdicts, judgments notwithstanding the verdict and new trials. These motions require the trial court to consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, Hargrove, to resolve all conflicts in his favor and to accept all inferences favorable to him. Teachey v. Woolard, 16 N.C. App. 249, 191 S.E. 2d 903 (1972). The evidence most favorable to Hargrove tends to show that Plumbing and Burlington controlled the area in front of Burlington’s oil tanks, that the area was within the scope…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Markham v. Duke Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Beachboard v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Doggett v. WelbornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Teachey v. WoolardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kirkpatrick & Associates, Inc. v. Wickes Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Cooper v. H. B. Owsley & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Wellmon v. HICKORY CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987