Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick & Associates, Inc. v. Wickes Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 4, 1981No. 8110SC44PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C-), Judge.

Summary judgment is appropriate only when the evidence before the court demonstrates that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). Here, the facts are not controverted. The sole issue on appeal is whether, as a matter of law, plaintiff is entitled to indemnification by defendant under the terms of the contract.

In interpreting a contract of indemnity, the Court’s function is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the parties, and the ordinary rules of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Hill v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Wheeler v. DentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Edwards v. HamillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Dixie Container Corp. of North Carolina v. DaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hoisington v. ZT-Winston-Salem AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. City of Wilmington v. North Carolina Natural Gas Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Atlantic Contracting & Material Co. v. AdcockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Candid Camera Video World, Inc. v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API