Kirkpatrick & Associates, Inc. v. Wickes Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C-), Judge.
Summary judgment is appropriate only when the evidence before the court demonstrates that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). Here, the facts are not controverted. The sole issue on appeal is whether, as a matter of law, plaintiff is entitled to indemnification by defendant under the terms of the contract.
In interpreting a contract of indemnity, the Court’s function is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the parties, and the ordinary rules of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gibbs v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Hill v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Wheeler v. DentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Edwards v. HamillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Dixie Container Corp. of North Carolina v. DaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hoisington v. ZT-Winston-Salem AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- City of Wilmington v. North Carolina Natural Gas Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Atlantic Contracting & Material Co. v. AdcockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Candid Camera Video World, Inc. v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.