Legal Opinion

State Bank of Waverly v. McCoy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1942No. 45813PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStigeR, J.

The sole question on appeal is whether appellant is liable on the notes. Her defenses to the notes are (1) that she received no consideration for her signature and signed the notes and mortgage for the sole purpose of relinquishing her dower interest, and (2) that she was a surety on the notes and was discharged by an extension agreement granted the principals on the notes by appellee without her consent.

I. On March 3, 1926, M. J. McCoy and his wife, Emma McCoy, appellant, and others, executed and delivered the notes and mortgage which are the subject matter of this suit to ap-pellee, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hinman v. TreinenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. Insell v. McDanielsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. LeFleur v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. American Commercial & Savings Bank v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Starry v. Starry LynchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beneficial Finance Company of Waterloo v. LamosSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Bjornsen Construction Co. v. J. A. Whitmer & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. United States v. Wesley J. Warwick and Eunice B. WarwickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Knapp v. KnappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API