Legal Opinion

American Commercial & Savings Bank v. Kramer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 26, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The material facts are not in dispute. It appears from- the record that the mortgage foreclosed was executed by one Worley, then owner of the mortgaged property. In the year 1921, W. H. Goodman purchased the property from Worley, and assumed the mortgage as a part of the purchase price. The mortgage debt was to mature March 1, 1925. On January 13, 1925, Goodmañ sought an agreement for an extension of the due date of the mortgage. The local agent of the plaintiff .was one McCall. Goodman applied to him for the extension. As a condition of such extension, McCall first required that .$2,000…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hinman v. TreinenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. Insell v. McDanielsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. LeFleur v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Gorman v. SampicaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. First National Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. First-Trust Joint Stock Land Bank of Chicago v. MeredithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People's State Bank v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Cooley v. WillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Nolte v. NolteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Commercial Savings Bank v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API