Trumble Gas Trap Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

Only one question of primary importance is presented by this proceeding, and that is whether the trial court acquired jurisdiction of the defendant through the kind of service had in the case. The other question presented is merely incidental to this.

Jurisdiction in this case, in so far as venue (may affect it, is limited to the question of whether H. E. Hurst was an agent of the defendant in Tulsa county within the meaning of any of the statutory provisions relating to service of process on railroad companies. This is so because in plaintiff’s petition it is not alleged…