Legal Opinion

Cole v. Singerly

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cecil County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff on the second count of the declaration for §105.43, and found for the defendant upon the first and third counts. Judgment was entered upon the verdict. The plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtYellott, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court for Cecil County, in an action brought by the appellant, the plaintiff below, for an alleged breach of a contract. The declaration contains three counts. The first sets out the special contract: the others being the common counts for “ work and labor done,” and “an account stated.”

It appears from the record that the appellee, a resident of the City of Philadelphia, having entered into negotiations for the purchase of a certain mill, situate in Cecil County, Maryland, and owned by a Mr. Patton, found the plaintiff in charge of said mill,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ellicott v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nickerson v. President of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Fitzpatrick v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  3. Home News, Inc. v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. Horner v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  5. Campbell v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API