Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Burnett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1913PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit- Court for Baltimore City (Bond, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

The appellants, plaintiffs below, filed their bill in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City against the appellees, in which the facts alleged are substantially as follows:

Clara Campbell, one of the plaintiffs, in the year 1899, loaned unto her husband. J. Vernon Campbell, diamonds and jewelry belonging to her. of the value of about $2,000, to be used by him as collateral security in obtaining a loan of that amount. Subsequently the loan was obtained from one Edward J. Codd, individually, who at such time was conducting a business under the firm name of E. <T. Codd & Company, and to him the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellicott v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  2. Union Passenger Railway Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  3. Belt v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  4. Bruns v. SpaldingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  5. Cole v. SingerlyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Griffith v. One Investment Plaza AssociatesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Grandberg v. BernardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Hungerford v. HungerfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. General Federal Construction, Inc. v. James A. Federline, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Legum v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API