Legal Opinion
Home News, Inc. v. Goodman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 13, 1944No. [Nos. 63-68, October Term, 1943.]PublishedCited by 23 opinions
October Term, 1943.]
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
One Seymour J. Goodman, complainant below, appellee here, employed formerly as an advertising solicitor by the Baltimore Post, did not continue his position when that paper was absorbed by the Baltimore News in 1934. Messrs. Joseph and Walter Goldstein at that time were partners in a printing business using the name, Twentieth Century Printing Company. The Goldsteins had in their establishment a rotary press which they were anxious to keep busy. Goodman approached them with the idea of organizing a shopping paper in Baltimore to be owned and financed by the merchants and to be printed by the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carnig v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Ellicott v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- McCullough Iron Co. v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Small v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
- Fitzpatrick v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bart Arconti & Sons, Inc. v. Ames-Ennis, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Lipscomb v. HessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Arthur Elevator Co. v. GroveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Rudinsky v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.