Granite Management Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This matter is before the court on its order directing plaintiff to show cause why its takings claim should not be dismissed in light of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s (Federal Circuit) decision in Castle, et al. v. United States, 301 F.3d 1328 (Fed.Cir.2002). Plaintiff asserts that dismissing its takings claim prior to resolving contractual liability and damages is premature because it is unclear if plaintiff will receive “just compensation” for defendant’s breach of contract. Defendant contends that plaintiffs takings claim is identical to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Detroit Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Pi Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Granite Management Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.