Legal Opinion

Hulbert v. Port of Everett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 18, 2011No. 64102-6-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpearman, J.

¶1 — This appeal arises from the 1991 sale of 30 acres of land by appellants (the Hulberts) to the Port of Everett (Port) through an agreement of purchase and sale (Agreement). An exhibit to the Agreement provided for the Hulberts to indemnify the Port, for three years after the date of sale, for any liability incurred by the Port arising from the discovery and cleanup of hazardous substances existing on the property before the date of sale. Approximately 15 years later, in 2006, the Port notified the Hulberts that they were potentially liable parties under the Model Toxics Control Act…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Janaszak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Davis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Gull Industries, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Martin v. DematicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. West Consultants, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API