Gull Industries, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Verellen, A.C.J.
¶1 The Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), chapter 70.105D RCW, imposes strict liability on the owner or operator of contaminated property. Such strict liability may trigger the duty to indemnify under *466commercial liability policies even if no agency has taken or overtly threatened formal legal action.1 We are asked to decide what triggers a duty to defend “any suit” when the owner of contaminated property faces strict liability under the MTCA. We conclude that the term “suit” is ambiguous in this context and does not require that a summons and complaint be filed or served or that…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Hazen Paper Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McGinnes Industrial Maintenance Corporation v. the Phoenix Insurance Company and the Travelers Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Todd Mclaughlin v. Travelers Commercial Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Chadwick & April Ferguson v. Martha Standley & Chuck StandleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Cont'l Cas. Co. v. C.D. Stimson Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Eakin Enterprises, Inc. v. Stratton Ballew, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.