Legal Opinion

Estate of Gerhardus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Did the court have power to make the order in question? If not, our labor is at an end; if so, we must determine whether such power was rightfully exercised.

It is well established in this jurisdiction that the trial court has the inherent power to alter, modify or reverse any order, judgment, or decree during the term at which it was made. Hudelson v. Sanders-Swafford Co. et al., 111 Or. 600 (227 Pac. 310), citing many decisions of this court. In a few jurisdictions it is held that an order erroneously denying a motion for a new trial can be corrected only on appeal, but such rule does not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hudelson v. Sanders-Swafford Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Lookabaugh v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  4. Manning v. GregoireOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Barnes v. BruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Arbogast v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. SullensOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Peoples Electric Co-Operative v. BroughtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API