Legal Opinion
Metsopulos v. Runyon
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 13, 1996No. Civil A. No. 94-1899(JCL)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIFLAND, District Judge.
Defendant Marvin Runyon, the United States Postmaster General (“Postal Ser-: vice”), moves to dismiss this action and for summary judgment, asserting that Louis Metsopulos’ employment ' discrimination claims are either time-barred, untenable as a matter of law, or not cognizable by this Court given plaintiffs failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Metsopulos, pro se, contends that he has exhausted his administrative remedies and that discovery will uncover factual evidence with which he could parry the Postal Service’s summary judgment thrust. For…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- 79 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 228, 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,737, 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,737 Evelyn O. Holley v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Hershel Gober, Acting SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Belhomme v. WidnallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Harel v. Rutgers, State UniversityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- United States ex rel. Malloy v. Telephonics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chester Holdings, Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.