Legal Opinion
Harel v. Rutgers, State University
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 24, 1998No. Civ. 95-5137(WHW)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
Dr. Arie Harel (“Harel”) brings this civil rights action against Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey (“Rutgers” or “the University”), Dr. Joseph Seneca, Vice President for Academic Affairs (“Seneca”), and Dr. Francis Lawrence, President of Rutgers (“Lawrence”). Harel alleges that the defendants denied him tenure on account of his Israeli national origin and gender in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). Defendants have moved for summary judgment. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 78, the…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Clayton v. BransonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Summy-Long v. Pennsylvania State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re Cendant Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Bolinger v. Bell AtlanticNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Izydore v. TokutaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.