Legal Opinion
Redken Laboratories, Inc. v. Clairol Incorporated
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 15, 1972No. 70-2770-MMLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order of Judgment
LUCAS, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed a complaint under 15 U.S.C. § 1071(b) for restoration of a trademark filed with the United States Patent Office. The trademark, “CURL & CONDITION,” refers to a permanent wave lotion for which the Patent Office issued Registration No. 858,448 on October 8, 1968. On October 29, 1970, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the Patent Office granted defendant’s petition for cancellation of the trademark. 168 U.S.P.Q. 187. Plaintiff appealed the cancellation decision to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals under 15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Etc. v. Maier Brewing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Syntex Laboratories, Inc. v. The Norwich Pharmacal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- International Election Systems Corp. v. ShoupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Airwick Industries, Inc. v. Alpkem CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1974