Legal Opinion

Airwick Industries, Inc. v. Alpkem Corporation

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 11, 1974No. Civ. 72-755PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURNS, District Judge:

Plaintiff Airwick, a New York corporation primarily engaged in the manufacture of odor counteractants, seeks an injunction 1 against Defendant Alpkem, an Oregon corporation which began business in 1969 making and selling chemical reagents for automated blood testing devices. Plaintiff, alleges trademark infringement and false designation of origin of products in violation of the Trademark Act of 1946, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127; dilution of trademark and trade name as prohibited by Oregon’s recently enacted anti-dilution statute, O.R.S. 647.107; and the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Etc. v. Maier Brewing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Polaroid Corporation v. Polaraid, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beef & Brew, Inc. v. Beef & Brew, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1974
  2. Classic Instruments, Inc. v. VDO-Argo Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Aero-Motive Co. v. U.S. Aeromotive, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
  4. Keystone Retaining Wall System, Inc. v. Westrock, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1991
  5. Saunders v. Air-Flo Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API