Legal Opinion
Trefethen v. New Hampshire Insurance Group
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 27, 1994No. 92-724PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
New Hampshire Insurance Group (NHIG), defendant in the declaratory judgment action below, appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Barry, J.) requiring it to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs, Mercer and Irene Trefethen. NHIG argues that the trial court erred, inter alia, in allowing the plaintiffs to present theories that had been removed from the declaratory judgment ac*711tion, in determining which coverage was in effect, and in applying the doctrine of estoppel. We affirm.
The pertinent facts follow. The Trefethens opened a convenience store known as Red’s Variety in 1985 and through…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Robbins Auto Parts, Inc. v. Granite State InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Olszak v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Karol v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- V & V Corp. v. American Policyholders' InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United National Insurance v. Penuche's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Godbout v. Lloyd's Insurance Syndicates Messrs. Mendes & MountSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Dewyngaerdt v. Bean Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. RasmussenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Epsom House of Pizza v. Comm. UnionDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.