Legal Opinion

A. Perley Fitch Co. v. Continental Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 21, 1954No. 4229PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

It is conceded by the defendant that it has waived the policies’ requirements of notice of loss. However, the policies provide with reference to the conditions precedent as follows: “No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the requirements of this policy shall have been complied with. ...” It is undisputed that under our law unless the plaintiff’s failure to comply with the requirement of proof of loss is excused on the ground of waiver, estoppel or for some other good reason, there must be a nonsuit. Bean v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mutual, Etc., Ins. Co. v. WatkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Roberts v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Bedford School District v. Caron Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. Grau v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. KJ Quinn & Co., Inc. v. Continental Cas.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API