Legal Opinion
Fallang v. Hickey
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1988No. 87-1828PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.
I
The principal issue presented is whether Fallang established personal jurisdiction over Long. Because the trial court determined Long’s Civ. R. 12(B)(2) motion to dismiss upon written submissions, Fallang needed only to make a prima facie showing that jurisdiction exists. 2A Moore, Federal Practice (1987), Paragraph 12.07[2.-2]. For the reasons that follow, we find that Fallang met his burden of showing the existence of personal jurisdiction. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
The determination of whether a state court has personal jurisdiction over a nonresident is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Kentucky Oaks Mall Co. v. Mitchell's Formal Wear, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- U.S. Sprint Communications Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Mr. K's Foods, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Kauffman Racing Equipment, L.L.C. v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Fraley v. Estate of OedingOhio Supreme Court · 2014
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.