Legal Opinion

Levitsky v. Wirzes

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 5, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill is filed by a general creditor of defendant Walter Reifer and seeks to restrain a sale now advertised under a chattel mortgage executed by Walter Reifer and his wife to defendants Rafoll Wirzes and Anna Wirzes, and to set aside the mortgage as in fraud of the mortgagor's creditors. Hearing has been had, at the return of an order to show cause, on the bill and annexed affidavits and answering affidavits filed by defendants. A motion to dismiss the bill for want of jurisdiction also has been made by defendants.

The facts presented by the bill and its accompanying affidavits discloses a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Axt v. 61 Lincoln ParkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  2. Jaburg v. KirschenbaumNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harder v. HarderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. State of Ohio v. ClarkeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API