Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Donoho

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1989No. 3-89-036-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWERS, Justice.

Thirteen individuals, responsible for the governance and administration of the University of Texas at Austin, appeal from an order of the district court which directs that a cause of action, brought against them by Travis Donoho, James Kieke, and Cecilia E. Botero, be maintained as a class action under the provisions of Tex.R.Civ.P. 42. 1 Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(3) (Supp.1989). We will affirm the order.

THE CONTROVERSY

To recover back wages, allegedly due them in their employment by the university, Donoho, Kieke, and Botero sued the university officials. They…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In the Interest of W.E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Lassiter v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Jones v. DiamondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. BernalTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Microsoft Corp. v. Manning, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  3. America Online, Inc. v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Employers Casualty Co. v. Texas Ass'n of School Boards Workers' Compensation Self-Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Sun Coast Resources, Inc. v. Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API