Legal Opinion

Spaugh v. Peterson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1926No. 1241PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. Kimball, Justice.

This is a replevin action in which the judgment was for the plaintiff. The case was here before on appeal, and the appeal was dismissed. 31 Wyo. 26; 222 Pac. 580. It is here no^v on error, but without a bill of exceptions. The only assigned error is that the petition is insufficient to support the judgment.

The objection to the petition is that it shows that plaintiff is not the real party in interest. We must treat the case as one where the petition is not challenged until after judgment. The answer raises no question as to the real party in interest. The record contains a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Fast v. WhitneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Chapman v. First National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Peterson v. SpaughWyoming Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claughton v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Board of County Com'rs. v. BrewerWyoming Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API