Legal Opinion

United States v. Benjamin Magliano, Anthony Nick Magliano, and Vincent Desantis, United States of America v. Benjamin Magliano and Vincent Desantis

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1964No. 9308_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

The two appellants and Anthony Nick Magliano, a brother of one of the appellants, were found guilty by the District Court, sitting without a jury, of a conspiracy to violate federal wagering tax laws and four substantive offenses under the revenue laws. 1 Harry Anapa was also named in the indictment as a co-conspirator, but was not indicted. Anthony Nick Magliano, hereinafter referred to as “Nick,” has not appealed.

Each of the three defendants below was sentenced for a period of two years on the conspiracy count and given one-year sentences on counts 3 and 5, all…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. Frank SaccoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API