Legal Opinion

Compton v. Hammond Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The respondent, Ralph Compton, has filed a motion for correction or modification of the mandate in this case by including therein interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from December 5,1934, the date of the judgment in the circuit court, on the sum of $700 awarded on his first cause of action, and on the sum of $45.65 allowed to him as costs in the circuit court. He also moves that the mandate be further corrected by allowing interest from November 19,1933, on the $300 allowed by this court on his second cause of action, that being the last date of the period for which he claimed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. De La Rama v. De La RamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Wilson v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Morris v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Yarno v. Hedlund Box & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Butler v. State Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Pearson v. SchmittOregon Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API