Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 1986No. CX-86-374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge

Mark Hall appeals from his conviction' of first degree criminal sexual conduct con tending the trial court abused its discretion by admitting expert testimony about the behavioral characteristics of sexually abused adolescents. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

On July 25, 1985 appellant was charged with one count each of first degree and third degree criminal sexual conduct under Minn.Stat. §§ 609.342(b) and 609.344(b) (1984). The complaint alleged appellant sexually assaulted W.A.P., a 14-year-old babysitter. A St. Louis County District Court jury found…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Buddy Joe BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. LoebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. State v. HelterbridleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API