Legal Opinion
Daniel v. Boeing Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided January 24, 2011No. C09-0890RSLPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on “Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.” Dkt. # 13. Plaintiff has asserted claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Washington Law Against Discrimination. Opposition (Dkt. #21) at 2. 1 Defendants seek dismissal of all of plaintiffs remaining claims.
Summary judgment is appropriate when, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact that would preclude the entry of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Creative Networks, L.L.C.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- McElwain v. Boeing Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Hansen v. Boeing Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Trizuto v. Bellevue Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- Bell v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.