Legal Opinion

Corliss v. Pulaski County

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 6, 1902No. 843PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois. This is an action to recover upon certain bonds issued by the county of Pulaski to the Cairo & Vincennes Railroad Company on October 7, 1872, and upon certain coupons for interest thereon. A plea of the general issue was filed, with a stipulation that all proper defenses might be made thereunder as if pleaded by way of special plea, and issue joined thereon.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois. This is an action to recover upon certain bonds issued by the county of Pulaski to the Cairo & Vincennes Railroad Company on October 7, 1872, and upon certain coupons for interest thereon. A plea of the general issue was filed, with a stipulation that all proper defenses might be made thereunder as if pleaded by way of special plea, and issue joined thereon. The cause was by stipulation tried to the court without a jury, and on June 23, 1901, the court found generally the issues for the defendant, and…

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts a's above). The finding of the trial court upon the facts may be “either general or special.” Rev. St. § 649. It cannot be both. British Queen Min. Co. v. Baker Silver Min. Co., 139 U. S. 222, 11 Sup. Ct. 523, 35 L. Ed. 147; Austin v. Hamilton Co., 22 C. C. A. 128, 76 Fed. 210; Wesson v. Saline Co., 20 C. C. A. 227, 73 Fed. 917. Here the court rendered a general finding for the defendant below, upon which judgment was entered. Some two months thereafter, but at the same term, the trial *291judge signed a bill of exceptions, and also a paper purporting to be a special…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Wilson v. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Raimond v. Terrebonne ParishSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Streeter v. Sanitary Dist. of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
  2. Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  3. United States v. CleageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Java Cocoanut Oil Co. v. Pajaro Valley Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  5. American Nat. Bank v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API