City of Arvada v. Concrete Contractors, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
VAN CISE, Judge.
This case has been remanded by the Supreme Court for consideration on the merits following its decision that this court should have directed that a supplemental record be provided rather than dismissing the appeal because of appellant’s failure to supply a sufficient record. See Concrete Contractors, Inc. v. City of Arvada, Colo., 621 P.2d 320 (1981), rev’g, Colo.App., 622 P.2d 75 (1979). The supplemental record is now before us.
Defendants Concrete Contractors, Inc. (C.C.I.) and American Employer’s Insurance Co. (the bonding company) appeal the judgment requiring C.C.I. to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF CO. OF PITKIN v. BlanningColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
- Pomroy v. Board of Public Water WorksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Ireland v. JacobsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
- Satter v. City of LittletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Concrete Contractors, Inc. v. City of ArvadaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keyes v. AmundsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Marcher v. ButlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Nase v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Enerwest, Inc. v. Dyco Petroleum Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Farris v. ITT CANNON, a DIV. OF ITT CORP.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.