Legal Opinion

Satter v. City of Littleton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 13, 1974No. 26057, 26064 and 26060PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lee

In these consolidated cases, appellants, who are property owners in the city of Littleton, challenge the validity of special assessments levied against their property for street improvements. The district court rendered judgment for the city. We affirm.

Littleton is a home rule city, operating under a charter pursuant to Article XX, Section 6, of the Colorado Constitution. Section 92 of the home rule charter empowers the city to create local improvement districts, and to construct special improvements and assess the costs thereof to properties within the district specially benefited thereby.

Pur…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Denver v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Pomroy v. Board of Public Water WorksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. City and County of Denver v. GreenspoonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Orchard Court Development Co. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. Santa Fe Land Improvement Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lyman v. Town of Bow MarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. People v. PearsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Bloom v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Dixon Road Group v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Cline v. City of BoulderColorado Court of Appeals · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API