Legal Opinion
Pearson v. City of Manhattan
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 1, 1999No. 97-4086-DESPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 37) and defendant’s Motion to Strike Certain Portions of Affidavits (Doc. 46). Both parties have fully briefed the issues and the court is ready to rule.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The plaintiff initiated this action seeking damages under a three count complaint. In Count I, the plaintiff claims the defendant terminated him because of his disabilities, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. In Count II, the plaintiff claims the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gonzalez v. El Dia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Acevedo-Padilla v. Novartis Ex Lax, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- Glover v. NMC Homecare, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000