Petrucio v. Seardon
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Matagorda. Tried below before Hon. I. H. Dennis, Special District Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment or decree rendered December 7, 1888, confirming a report of commissioners of partition.
Read the full summary
Error from Matagorda. Tried below before Hon. I. H. Dennis, Special District Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment or decree rendered December 7, 1888, confirming a report of commissioners of partition. The original decree of partition adjusting the rights of the parties was rendered June, 1887. Commissioners appointed under the decree made their report December, 1887. (Outline of the report appears in opinion.) At that term, on objections of Petrucio, the defendant, the report was set aside and rejected. December, 1888, Fetrucio applied for the appointment of new commissioners. December 8…
1Opinion of the Court
ACKER, Presiding Judge.
Frank Seardon brought suit against. Joseph Fetrucio in trespass to try title to two particular tracts of land, one of three hundred acres and the other of fifteen acres, parts of the north one-third of the north one-third of the G. W. Dempsey headriglit. league survey, setting out the boundaries of each tract. On the same day D. E. E. Braman and W. C. Braman brought suit against Joseph Petrucio in trespass to try title to a particular tract of one hundred and sixty-one acres of land, also part of the north one-third of the north one-third of the G. W. Dempsey headlight…
2Cited by4 opinions
- White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Montoya v. Unknown Heirs of VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Sherley v. SherleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922