Legal Opinion

Estate of Kohls

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1973No. 210PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

The only issue on this appeal is whether the three-year statute of limitations 1 or the six-year statute of limitations 2 applies.

Appellant Donald Kohls concedes that, under the construction given the statutes involved by this court, the three-year statute of limitations applies. While a malpractice action can be brought either in tort or in contract, 3 it is an action to recover damages for injuries to the person. The word “action” as used in the three-year statute of limitations “. . . has reference to the subject matter or nature thereof, not to its form as a matter of remedial procedure.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eau Claire National Bank v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Klingbeil v. SaucermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Jewell v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Reistad v. ManzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Seifert v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. White v. LunderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kramer v. City of HaywardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hicks v. NunneryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. Wills v. ReganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API