Estate of Kohls
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The only issue on this appeal is whether the three-year statute of limitations 1 or the six-year statute of limitations 2 applies.
Appellant Donald Kohls concedes that, under the construction given the statutes involved by this court, the three-year statute of limitations applies. While a malpractice action can be brought either in tort or in contract, 3 it is an action to recover damages for injuries to the person. The word “action” as used in the three-year statute of limitations “. . . has reference to the subject matter or nature thereof, not to its form as a matter of remedial procedure.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eau Claire National Bank v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Klingbeil v. SaucermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Jewell v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Reistad v. ManzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Seifert v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- White v. LunderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Kramer v. City of HaywardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Hicks v. NunneryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Wills v. ReganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.