State v. Ohrt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS G. FORSBERG, Judge **
This appeal is from an order deferring sentencing on respondent Carter Ohrt’s guilty plea to domestic assault and providing that the plea would be vacated and the case dismissed after two years if Ohrt successfully completed probation. This court accepted jurisdiction over the appeal, concluding that the district court’s order was equivalent to a stay of adjudication, appealable by the state as a pretrial order. See State v. Thoma, 569 N.W.2d 205, 208 (Minn.App.), aff'd mem., 571 N.W.2d 773 (Minn.1997). We reverse.
FACTS
The state charged Ohrt with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- City of St. Paul v. FroyslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. ThomaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. C.P.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Bruce MartinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. AngottiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. ColbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. AngottiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.