Legal Opinion

State v. Colby

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 2003No. C1-02-1795PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s stay of adjudication, arguing that there was not a clear abuse of prosecutorial discretion that warranted the stay. Because a stay of adjudication may only be granted when there is a clear abuse of prosecutorial discretion, and because there is no evidence of such an abuse here, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Respondent Leann Marie Colby was charged with theft under Minn.Stat. § 609.52 (2000). Colby left a Target store with candy worth $27, for which she had not paid. At a plea hearing on the charge, Colby told the court that she had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. TwissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. LattimerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. State v. OhrtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Bruce MartinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. ColbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API