Legal Opinion
Mister v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided March 1, 1988No. Civ. 81-3006PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FOREMAN, Chief Judge:
This matter comes before the Court on defendant Illinois Central Gulf Railroad’s Motion to Stay (Document No. 362), made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2101(f) and Rule 62, F.R.Civ.Pro. For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes it is without jurisdiction to grant the requested relief.
Discussion
The primary question the Court must consider is whether it has jurisdiction to stay execution and enforcement of a judgment rendered by our Court of Appeals. After the trial of the case by this Court, judgment was entered in favor of the ICG and against the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Magnum Import Co. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Robert Earl Mister, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- In Re Norman StumesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- STUDIENGESELLSCHAFT KOHLE mbH v. Novamont Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Mister v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brinkman v. Department of Corrections of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- A.F. Moore & Associates, Inc. v. Charles KocorasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. LentzDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Cementos Guadalajara, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Lindner & Associates, P.C. v. Richards (In Re Richards)District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.