Legal Opinion

Mauthe v. B. & G. Service Station, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is defendant’s rule to show cause why a verdict recovered by Anthony Mauthe, administrator of Joseph Mauthe, deceased, should not be set aside and a new trial granted.

Joseph Mauthe, son of the plaintiff, was killed on February 26th, 1926. He was employed by the defendant in its gasoline supply station at the corner of Newark and Pavonia avenues, in Jersey City. The case was tried in the Hudson Circuit in January last and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $8,000.

The reasons urged for a now trial are that the court erred in refusing a nonsuit, that the verdict is…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McStay v. PrzychockiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Bohrman v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Goetaski v. California Packing Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Wilson v. Newark Smelting & Refining Co.New York County Court, Essex County · 1945
  5. Sakos v. ByersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API