Legal Opinion
Bohrman v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 5, 1952PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
23 N.J. Super. 399 (1952)
93 A.2d 190
PHILIP BOHRMAN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF BEVERLY M. BOHRMAN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND JOSEPH H. FITZSIMMONS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 10, 1952.
Decided December 5, 1952.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, PROCTOR and FRANCIS.
Mr. Francis M. Seaman argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.
Mr. Stephen VR. Strong argued the cause for the defendant-appellant Pennsylvania Railroad Company (Messrs. Strong & Strong, attorneys).
The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Turon v. J. & L. CONSTRUCTION CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Fuller v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State ex rel. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
- Cooper v. Shore Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- Wente v. ShaverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Waldorf v. ShutaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Currie v. FitingMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Green v. BittnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Carianni v. SchwenkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Rodriquez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.