Legal Opinion

Brodzki v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 24, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-1630Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F I L E D Anthony Brodzki, ) ULI 2 lt 2013 ) C|erk, U.S. District and Plaintiff, ) Bankruptcy Courts ) v. ) Civil Action No. l ) l@/ @ z 0 United States of America, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. l2(h)(3) (requiring the court to dismiss an action "at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abdurrahman v. EngstromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. Linda Charlene Jackson, Representative, Estate of George Jackson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Wightman-Cervantes v. MuellerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Martinez v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API