Legal Opinion
Abdurrahman v. Engstrom
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 13, 2005No. 05-5081PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed February 1, 2005 and March 2, 2005 be affirmed. An action may not be brought against the United States pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) unless the claimant has first presented his claim to the appropriate federal agency and the claim has been denied by the agency. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b); McNeil v. U.S., 508 U.S. 106, 111, 113 S.Ct. 1980, 124 L.Ed.2d 21 (1993).…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gaf Corporation v. United States of America. Keene Corporation v. United States of America. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
4Cited by83 opinions
- Cofield v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Hill v. SmootCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Morris v. United States Sentencing CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Tsitrin v. LettowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Lyles v. HughesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.