Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Melinda R. Alfredson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 2017No. 2016AP001400-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*80¶ 1.
2Per curiam
We review a stipulation filed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12 by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Melinda R. Alfredson. In the stipulation, Attorney Alfred-son admits that she committed professional misconduct, and she agrees with the OLR's request that her license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for a period of 60 days. Attorney Alfredson also agrees that she should pay restitution totaling $1,809.71 to two parties, divided as set forth below.
f 2. After careful review of the matter, we accept the stipulation and impose the requested discipline.…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. BartzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against PaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. BoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark S. TishbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
4Cited by3 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Alfredson (In Re Alfredson)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Melinda R. AlfredsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Melinda R. AlfredsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022