Legal Opinion
Allen Wiseley v. amazon.com, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 2017No. 15-56799UnpublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Allen Wiseley appeals from the district court’s order granting Amazon’s motion to compel arbitration. We have jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(3).
The Conditions of Use (COU) created a valid contract between Amazon and its customers, as Wiseley conceded. Applying California’s approach to determining the enforceability of the choice-of-law provision in the COU, see Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 187(2)(b); Nedlloyd Lines, B.V. v. Superior Court, 3 Cal. 4th 459, 466, 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 330, 834 P.2d 1148 (1992), we conclude that Washington law applies here. Wiseley fails…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Lorrie Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pilar Domer v. Menard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Acklie v. Greater Omaha Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Bolos v. Grand Wailea A Waldorf Astoria ResortDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024
- Escobar v. National Maintenance Contractors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Grant v. T-Mobile USA IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.