Legal Opinion
Nicely v. USX
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 30, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-0728PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MENCER, District Judge.
The instant matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed on behalf of the defendants, USX and United Steelworkers of America (“USWA”).
On June 12, 1985 the plaintiff, Brian L. Nicely (“Nicely”), filed a grievance # EET-85-46 with the USWA against USX alleging that USX breached the collective bargaining agreement, when it failed to assign him as a welder. In his present complaint Nicely asserts that USWA breached its duty of fair representation when Caleb Scott, USWA’s…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harrigan v. Caneel Bay, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1990
- Ryder v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996