Buchmann v. Turner
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant as executrix of the estate of Fred J. Buchmann, deceased, for recovery of $780.75 due by account, and recovered a judgment in the sum of $195, from which defendant prosecutes this appeal.
The complaint contained the simple count for money due by account, was in Code form, and sufficient. Alabama Lime & Stone Co. v. Adams, 218 Ala. 647, 119 So. 853. The statute of nonclaim has been treated and considered as defensive matter. McDougald’s Adm’r v. Dawson’s Ex’r, 30 Ala. 553; Pipkin v. Hewlett, 17 Ala. 291; Malone v. Hundley, 52 Ala. 147.
The case of Smith v. Fellows, 58…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Wise v. OuttrimSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Smith v. FellowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Alabama Lime & Stone Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Flinn v. ShacklefordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. CotnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Kilgore v. KimbrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Finlay v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- O'Neal v. PeadenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Dirago v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.